Another arrest warrant for a sitting American Indian Tribal Chairman?
First Eugene Little Coyote was arrested (December 28, 2007) when he resumed duties as Tribal President of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe after his Tribe's Constitutional Court ruled that he was indeed still President after a failed attempt to oust him from office. It was a contentious issue and the Council appears to have been divided for what some have called jealousy and others may believe that it is over the Natural Resource over which the Tribe's land sits: Coal Bed Methane. The largest untapped CBM reserve in the United States.
Now, in October 2008, we have Ben Nuvamsa of the Hopi Tribe who is under threat of arrest for apparently resuming his daily legal duty as Chairman of the Hopi Tribe. What Tribal Court would arrest the Chairman? I'm of the opinion that they might impeach him, they might rule against his decisions, but arrest him? Eugene Little Coyote and Ben Nuvamsa despite being from opposite north and south ends of the United States of America might share crib notes and come up with the same conclusion. It isn't easy being on top, so whatever your reason, stick to it.
It is unfortunate though--unfortunate that the environment is what is most likely to take the hit for all the misgivings of our activities.
It's unfortunate that the Dirty Percaps have raised their head again as well. You know my concept of dirty percaps is where you keep the Native American populations poor enough so that they'll jump at the opportunity to make relatively little money off of what you want to mine, to exploit, to become rich over.
Mining jobs. Yes they make money. The economic multiplier from every dollar spent from those paychecks is a boost for the entire regional economy.
You will do well to note the previous statements and consider their implications. I said that Natives could make "relatively little money" and "every dollar spent from those paychecks is a boost for the entire regional economy." The money made is relatively little COMPARED to the money that Peabody Coal is making by feeding a really minor fraction of what is made toward the paychecks. "Every Dollar spent from those paychecks" means that the rest of the money, the big money, the money paid by foreign companies ends up in the corporate accounts and is spent wherever the corporate leaders happen to live. How much money? Well on their own site they quote a figure of $4.6 billion in revenues, and that their coal products fuel approximately 10 percent of all U.S. electricity generation and 2 percent of worldwide electricity. Wow! Say, uh, where did they get that much coal?
They don't get rich by making others rich, who does? But they'll get by on the Hopi Reservation by providing a decent paying job to a few people. Is that really all they should give? Understandably, they provide the means to the market, but I tend to agree with Carl Venne of the Crow Tribe and Ben Nuvamsa, that the days of leasing are over. Carl Venne is making headway toward owning the mining process up north. "Equity Ownership is what we want," said Ben Nuvamsa in the October 29 issue of Indian Country today article 'Black Mesa Project Controversey Rises.' I hope that the eyes of all Indian Country see what that means.
I am not a big fan of destroying the water table anywhere, with polluting the entire railway (it does happen and then later has to be capped to be used and to prevent further pollution from whatever was on the trains), with coal and what it does to the environment. I guess it has to happen, but at what cost? If the case is to be made that it should be utilized then don't take what amounts to pennies on the dollar. It isn't that I encourage people to get rich off coal, but in the absence of any alternative efforts at providing subsistence to your people, own the process. Do not lease it because the longer you lease the resource right, the more the leasee makes, and like a well-fed stray dog, they do get more comfortable with coming back for more helpings year after year after year.
Do companies need to mine resources? Of course. Do they need to do it on a reservation? Of course they do--if you ask them. Do Natives need to LEASE the resource right off the rez? No.
If this is going to cost the health of the land, make all the money you can so you can repair it. Now this Peabody coal is making enough to apparently "restore" mining sites in Indiana, so they obviously have a lot of money. Where are they getting it? I'll bet from all the mines they extract from. How much is really going back into the reservations where they operate? When the mine is gone, what is left? What is really sustainable that the mine is leaving behind? And how much are they making off the resource extracted from Indian Land?
I would hope that in the interest of the environment, the greatest thinkers in Indian Country would come up with alternatives to these people who tear up the earth and leave it like an open scab and then walk away.
Then again, Eugene Little Coyote and Ben Nuvamsa and Carl Venne may be those great thinkers each with a different solution. Ultimately, the solution should come from their tribes. So for now we'll hope that Ben Nuvamsa doesn't fall victim to the same hand cuffs that bound Eugene Little Coyote. None of us can say what the best solution for them is. Only their respective tribes can.
Just keep your eyes open on your reservation when the corporate interests come knocking on your door. Don't let the $20 dollar-an-hour paycheck (dirty percaps) sway your opinion from what you and your heritage originally stood for before somebody put a dollar sign on your environment.
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Majel Russell Part Deux?
I am wondering if there is any chance Majel Russell might be seeking to get back into Carl Artman's office? Does she still have the keys?
I am in the earnest corner of "I hope she doesn't" because my opinion is that her stance on sovereignty thus far has not been within even the lightest shade of what True Sovereignty should be.
And because so many are oblivious to the facts surrounding her recent stint as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Bureau of Indian Affairs means that not all Native Americans are the best judges or the best references for Majel. Instead ask Eugene Little Coyote of the Northern Cheyenne Nation what his opinion on Majel Russell may be. (she signed an order recognizing a new Northern Cheyenne President in opposition to a Northern Cheyenne Constitutional Court Opinion). Ask members from California's Table Mountain Rancheria whose sovereignty was wiped clean by the efforts of an enthusiastic lawyer (Majel Russell) as their leadership was being turned upside-down what their opinion is on her view of Sovereignty. All this happened as she and her clients sought to "peacefully take over leadership." (Again she was party to a leadership dispute under circumstances which at least in part appears to have been undermining tribal sovereignty, as she tried to figure out who had jurisdiction on the reservation? duh! Tribal police: think "Sovereignty") At the heart of the matter is that both the incumbent and the "dissident" faction on the Table Mountain Rancheria had the reigns put on them by the Tribe. They wanted to decide who would lead them together, AS A WHOLE TRIBE. They did not need the outside "expertise" of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or some fancy lawyer who was not mediating, but instead intimidating by throwing the "Casino Percapita Bone" out in front of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. In an unexplainable move, Kevin Gover, the BIA Secretary at the time, issued recognition for the dissident faction, because of violations of a gaming allocation plan by the incumbent Tribal Chairman. Funny, I never knew the GAMING ALLOCATION PLAN would trump a LEGAL ELECTION by the people. (funny, just like the Northern Cheyenne's overturning, the Tribal Constitution is what should have prevailed, not the opinion of an outsider like a lawyer from another tribe, or an Assistant Secretary who didn't set up the Tribes' Constitutions)
Remember one of the glaring points of this blog is that "right does not necessarily mean it's good." Follow the rules until following them defeats the entire purpose (in relation to the trust responsibility and the benefit to the tribal member). The American Indians have a long trail of Federal Court rulings that we will all tell you are not ethical or beneficial to us as Nations. Just because you followed a case in a court of law does not mean it is necessarily beneficial or ethical. I tend to believe Aristotle's and Socrates' view that True Politics meant the pursuit of the "Common Good."
"Common Good" for Native Americans should mean equal treatment across the board, and the best and most economical treatment should be to let tribes decide for themselves to exercise their own sovereignty. And in the absence of them exercising sovereignty-in-action, let that remain as one of their options. Everything comes to an end eventually. It doesn't take a lawyer from outside a tribe to end a dispute. I believe talented people like Majel Russell may have a place in some courts for the Tribes. Her accumen has been sharp thus far, but like Saul, maybe she needs to take the talent she's been given and pour it into a new direction, a better direction, in support of True Sovereignty. Maybe. Maybe like life, the tribal disputes across the nation will run their course and lessons will be learned from the snail's-pace flow of action. At any rate, tribes do not need a court to define sovereignty. In fact, if you start to define sovereignty, you begin to limit it.
The day you tell someone what sovereignty is you should not stop talking...forever, (the definition is infinite) or you should just hand over the keys to your leadership office. Well in light of the fact that, in a small part of the Native American Public Opinion, Majel Russell stepped all over sovereignty in the Northern Cheyenne Nation just recently, I would hope that the whoever gains the Presidency would ask a very short list of people for references if she ever seeks another leadership position at the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or Office of Special Trustee, or the Department of the Interior. I'm hoping we don't hand the keys to our BIA leadership offices over to her if she ever pursues a leadership position under the next Administration.
I am in the earnest corner of "I hope she doesn't" because my opinion is that her stance on sovereignty thus far has not been within even the lightest shade of what True Sovereignty should be.
And because so many are oblivious to the facts surrounding her recent stint as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Bureau of Indian Affairs means that not all Native Americans are the best judges or the best references for Majel. Instead ask Eugene Little Coyote of the Northern Cheyenne Nation what his opinion on Majel Russell may be. (she signed an order recognizing a new Northern Cheyenne President in opposition to a Northern Cheyenne Constitutional Court Opinion). Ask members from California's Table Mountain Rancheria whose sovereignty was wiped clean by the efforts of an enthusiastic lawyer (Majel Russell) as their leadership was being turned upside-down what their opinion is on her view of Sovereignty. All this happened as she and her clients sought to "peacefully take over leadership." (Again she was party to a leadership dispute under circumstances which at least in part appears to have been undermining tribal sovereignty, as she tried to figure out who had jurisdiction on the reservation? duh! Tribal police: think "Sovereignty") At the heart of the matter is that both the incumbent and the "dissident" faction on the Table Mountain Rancheria had the reigns put on them by the Tribe. They wanted to decide who would lead them together, AS A WHOLE TRIBE. They did not need the outside "expertise" of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or some fancy lawyer who was not mediating, but instead intimidating by throwing the "Casino Percapita Bone" out in front of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. In an unexplainable move, Kevin Gover, the BIA Secretary at the time, issued recognition for the dissident faction, because of violations of a gaming allocation plan by the incumbent Tribal Chairman. Funny, I never knew the GAMING ALLOCATION PLAN would trump a LEGAL ELECTION by the people. (funny, just like the Northern Cheyenne's overturning, the Tribal Constitution is what should have prevailed, not the opinion of an outsider like a lawyer from another tribe, or an Assistant Secretary who didn't set up the Tribes' Constitutions)
Remember one of the glaring points of this blog is that "right does not necessarily mean it's good." Follow the rules until following them defeats the entire purpose (in relation to the trust responsibility and the benefit to the tribal member). The American Indians have a long trail of Federal Court rulings that we will all tell you are not ethical or beneficial to us as Nations. Just because you followed a case in a court of law does not mean it is necessarily beneficial or ethical. I tend to believe Aristotle's and Socrates' view that True Politics meant the pursuit of the "Common Good."
"Common Good" for Native Americans should mean equal treatment across the board, and the best and most economical treatment should be to let tribes decide for themselves to exercise their own sovereignty. And in the absence of them exercising sovereignty-in-action, let that remain as one of their options. Everything comes to an end eventually. It doesn't take a lawyer from outside a tribe to end a dispute. I believe talented people like Majel Russell may have a place in some courts for the Tribes. Her accumen has been sharp thus far, but like Saul, maybe she needs to take the talent she's been given and pour it into a new direction, a better direction, in support of True Sovereignty. Maybe. Maybe like life, the tribal disputes across the nation will run their course and lessons will be learned from the snail's-pace flow of action. At any rate, tribes do not need a court to define sovereignty. In fact, if you start to define sovereignty, you begin to limit it.
The day you tell someone what sovereignty is you should not stop talking...forever, (the definition is infinite) or you should just hand over the keys to your leadership office. Well in light of the fact that, in a small part of the Native American Public Opinion, Majel Russell stepped all over sovereignty in the Northern Cheyenne Nation just recently, I would hope that the whoever gains the Presidency would ask a very short list of people for references if she ever seeks another leadership position at the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or Office of Special Trustee, or the Department of the Interior. I'm hoping we don't hand the keys to our BIA leadership offices over to her if she ever pursues a leadership position under the next Administration.
Monday, October 6, 2008
The N8tive Prayer..
A little levity never hurt anyone
The Ndnz Prayer
Our Interior which art in DC, hallowed be thy name
Thy secretaries come, to make sure Great Father’s will be done in
Give us this day our daily bread which might be moldy by now because you’ve been withholding it so long
And forgive our overdue loans as we borrow on our car titles to get by with outdated groceries from the thrift store
And lead us not into poverty, (although you shouldn’t push us either!)
But deliver us from lawsuits regarding the Cobell suit
For thine policies and regulations have to be translated into 562 languages which will take forever and ever, amen….
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Two cheers for Dirk Kempthorne!
The United States Department of the Interior released a report today, "Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne Initiates Action Following Receipt of Inspector General Reports."
Dirk Kempthorne will get two cheers for now and the third? Well, I think he deserves a third cheer when he e x p a n d s his display of leadership ethics and exercises justice over the fiasco over unethical behavior at the Office of Special Trustee.
What makes it different? Is it that they wasted resources, time, and the reputation of an otherwise sound agency belonging to the United States instead of from Native Americans? I am not saying it is, I'm just asking, why now, why this agency and why not before when equally damaging behavior happened at the Office of Special Trustee?
Was it equally damaging? Well I would think that to the people who filed reports with the Inspector General, Earl Devaney, putting their jobs at risk, it would be equally damaging to their quality of life. To the people who were waiting for objective management of their resources, it would be equally damaging. To people who were expecting just treatment of disciplinary problems, when Ross Swimmer assigned "corrective training," for Donna Erwin and Doug and Jeff Lords instead of real disciplinary action, yes it is my opinion that it was equally damaging. And when one of the three Ringling Trustees recently got promoted, well that was too much.
So, while Mines and Minerals Management Service gets scrutiny, Native Americans everywhere wait for a little bit of attention on our fire. We wait for justice, we wait for the Trust to be put into the Office of Special TRUSTee.
Dirk Kempthorne will get two cheers for now and the third? Well, I think he deserves a third cheer when he e x p a n d s his display of leadership ethics and exercises justice over the fiasco over unethical behavior at the Office of Special Trustee.
What makes it different? Is it that they wasted resources, time, and the reputation of an otherwise sound agency belonging to the United States instead of from Native Americans? I am not saying it is, I'm just asking, why now, why this agency and why not before when equally damaging behavior happened at the Office of Special Trustee?
Was it equally damaging? Well I would think that to the people who filed reports with the Inspector General, Earl Devaney, putting their jobs at risk, it would be equally damaging to their quality of life. To the people who were waiting for objective management of their resources, it would be equally damaging. To people who were expecting just treatment of disciplinary problems, when Ross Swimmer assigned "corrective training," for Donna Erwin and Doug and Jeff Lords instead of real disciplinary action, yes it is my opinion that it was equally damaging. And when one of the three Ringling Trustees recently got promoted, well that was too much.
So, while Mines and Minerals Management Service gets scrutiny, Native Americans everywhere wait for a little bit of attention on our fire. We wait for justice, we wait for the Trust to be put into the Office of Special TRUSTee.
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Excuse me while I interrupt myself...
IndianTrust.com is reporting just now that a number of news accounts – particularly The Associated Press - are incorrectly saying that the plaintiffs have rejected a $7 billion offer from the government to settle the Indian Trust lawsuit. They say it simply isn’t true.
Imagine that? A news report saying things that aren't true? The nerve!
Indian Trust reports the facts to be that:
The government has never offered to settle the Cobell vs. Kempthorne lawsuit at any price.
Instead it is pointed out that the Bush administration in March 2007 suggested it was willing to spend $7 billion over 10 years to resolve a wide range of major Indian issues, including land fractional land claims, the Cobell suit, all individual land mismanagement claims, the 100 plus trust lawsuits filed by tribes and pay for all of trust reform as well.
Oh yes, and it also included provisions to deny Indians any right to bring any future lawsuits for future mismanagement no matter how egregious. That final provision was essentially a license to steal. This proposal was universally condemned by everyone not associated with the government, including a wide range of Native leaders.
Ms. Cobell did note that a mediator had suggested recoveries could run between $7 billion to $9 billion in the case. She said she "would want to talk about that more." Hardly a rejection.
But the Bush administration never followed up on her overture. In fact, federal officials have never made any offer to the Cobell legal team to settle the class action lawsuit for any specific amount.
In 2006, the Senate Indian Affairs Committee did introduce legislation to settle the lawsuit without a specific dollar amount. The Committee later amended that bill to include an $8 billion figure but the bill never moved out of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee because of objections raised by the (Sudanese? South Korean, Spanish, noooooo...the United Snakes!) government.
The position of the Cobell plaintiffs has long been that we will consider reasonable offers from the United States to resolve this case. Unfortunately, none has been put forth.
Well, well, well...very well put if you ask me. But then who did the AP go ask to get these "facts of mythic porportion?
To view the latest information concerning this case, go to www.indiantrust.com
Imagine that? A news report saying things that aren't true? The nerve!
Indian Trust reports the facts to be that:
The government has never offered to settle the Cobell vs. Kempthorne lawsuit at any price.
Instead it is pointed out that the Bush administration in March 2007 suggested it was willing to spend $7 billion over 10 years to resolve a wide range of major Indian issues, including land fractional land claims, the Cobell suit, all individual land mismanagement claims, the 100 plus trust lawsuits filed by tribes and pay for all of trust reform as well.
Oh yes, and it also included provisions to deny Indians any right to bring any future lawsuits for future mismanagement no matter how egregious. That final provision was essentially a license to steal. This proposal was universally condemned by everyone not associated with the government, including a wide range of Native leaders.
Ms. Cobell did note that a mediator had suggested recoveries could run between $7 billion to $9 billion in the case. She said she "would want to talk about that more." Hardly a rejection.
But the Bush administration never followed up on her overture. In fact, federal officials have never made any offer to the Cobell legal team to settle the class action lawsuit for any specific amount.
In 2006, the Senate Indian Affairs Committee did introduce legislation to settle the lawsuit without a specific dollar amount. The Committee later amended that bill to include an $8 billion figure but the bill never moved out of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee because of objections raised by the (Sudanese? South Korean, Spanish, noooooo...the United Snakes!) government.
The position of the Cobell plaintiffs has long been that we will consider reasonable offers from the United States to resolve this case. Unfortunately, none has been put forth.
Well, well, well...very well put if you ask me. But then who did the AP go ask to get these "facts of mythic porportion?
To view the latest information concerning this case, go to www.indiantrust.com
Thursday, August 7, 2008
The Dismal Cobell Dismissal
MARY CLARE JALONICK has a report just out: Judge says Indians owed $455m in trust case
U.S. District Judge James Robertson has summarily dismissed any billion dollar claim the Cobell plaintiff's had against the government. He has issued an opinion saying that Indians are entitled to 455 million dollars as part of the broken Trust duties of the United States. That's not even 1 million to each of the 562 tribes across the nation. Really? Really enit? They (the U.S. Government) were that accurate from 1887? Wow! Somebody nominate this government for a Quality Management Award!
Judge James Robertson says that Eloise Cobell et al. didn't prove that damages included benefits to the United States that the U.S. received as part of mis-use of the Trust Funds, despite the fact that it was argued that the trust funds were used to down-size some government debts.
Funny part is that he says in his ending statement, "The Cobell case will no doubt stand, in some respects, as a cautionary tale about the limited ability of a court to right historical wrongs that could have been — and should have been — settled by the same political branches in recognition of their own failure to preserve the trust."
Aint it the truth?
U.S. District Judge James Robertson has summarily dismissed any billion dollar claim the Cobell plaintiff's had against the government. He has issued an opinion saying that Indians are entitled to 455 million dollars as part of the broken Trust duties of the United States. That's not even 1 million to each of the 562 tribes across the nation. Really? Really enit? They (the U.S. Government) were that accurate from 1887? Wow! Somebody nominate this government for a Quality Management Award!
Judge James Robertson says that Eloise Cobell et al. didn't prove that damages included benefits to the United States that the U.S. received as part of mis-use of the Trust Funds, despite the fact that it was argued that the trust funds were used to down-size some government debts.
Funny part is that he says in his ending statement, "The Cobell case will no doubt stand, in some respects, as a cautionary tale about the limited ability of a court to right historical wrongs that could have been — and should have been — settled by the same political branches in recognition of their own failure to preserve the trust."
Aint it the truth?
Friday, August 1, 2008
According to the story BISON ROUNDUP LEADS TO LAWSUIT reported in the Billings Gazette by Laura Tode, George and Nelvette Siemion have a lawsuit pending against the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
It may come as somewhat of a surprise that the notices that were sent to them from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) were not picked up; well if you live off the rez it may come as a surprise. I personally have had several mail items returned to the sender because I didn't pick up the mail in time. It's a fact of life for some people and post office boxes.
But that is a minor point in this scenario. So don't take the red herring! Stick to the point!
The point is that there was a sovereign governmental process for processing bids. The TRIBAL members (PEOPLE LIKE YOU) who already had a lease in years past on the Crow Reservation had the chance to match the bid put out by the new (shadow) tribal member bids.
What is a shadow member? Much like many small TIMBER-BUSINESSES, it's a false front that a tribal member is an owner of a small business. If they are a timber company, then it means that they get preference in timber bids. If it's a Cattle company, they get preference in Grazing bids.
How does it work?
"Well Zeke, ya see that Tribal Member over there chewing on bubble gum doing, nothing in particular?"
"Do I see him, heck I can hear him popping bubbles!"
"Well Zeke, ya go make him an offer to make money for nothing"
"OK I get it. I make him a majority interest holder in 'our lil ol cattle company' and promise to give him 1 dollar an acre ($4,000 dollars) for getting me a preferential-like bid on them there 4,000 acres right?"
"There's a smart boy Zeke..."
Aha! Timber, Grazing, Tree planting, any number of businesses can make the world seem much different if they have a tribla member partner with a majority interest in their enterprise. Which is ok, as long as it's above board. If anybody else is a fan of 8-A Status stand up and burp loudly! That isn't the part that's wrong.
The part that's wrong is when BIA steps all over sovereignty. The part that's wrong is if this couple George and Nelvette Siemion don't get to pursue the appeal process to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals if they need to.
When you appeal to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, there are a multitude of areas where your appeal can be thrown out for seemingly small details. The death is in the details. Read your CFR very well if you're gonna sit down for a bout with the BIA. If you put the wrong words on the envelope or no words, THROWN OUT! If you fail to certify that you sent the appeal to all "parties of interest" THROWN OUT! If you fail to send to everybody in the world and their cousin, THROWN OUT!
Let's hope George Skibine will allow this appeal to follow it's natural route and if need be all the way to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals. Let's hope that this appeal gets taken care of before it reaches the Interior Board of Indian Appeals. If this appeal gets to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals then it means that somebody lower than them in the Bureau, the Region, the Area, the Agency, probably isn't doing their job. The Interior Board of Indian Appeals should be the last resort of George and Nelvette Siemion. But George and Nelvette Siemion should have every right to pursue this case all the way to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals, and George Skibine seems like just the objective person to let it run its natural course. There should be none of this stepping in and pre-empting a case instead of letting the Interior Board of Indian Appeals do just what they're supposed to do.
George should, in his non-acting position, not get involved, but make sure that every step, every superintendent, director, manager, specialist, is involved and pursuing justice, whatever that decision may be. Justice is what every tribal member is looking for. Let's hope that in this case, the tribal members get their say. Let's not go for a repeat of past Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary's woeful decisions against tribal sovereignty and objective judicial inquiries. George Skibine, may we introduce you to George and Nelvette Siemion? They have a Native Land Issue to discuss with the appropriate levels of the Bureau of Indian Affairs? Could you see to it that, without influencing anybody in either direction, everybody knows that an objective, judicial decision with respect to Tribal Sovereignty is reached--and if it isn't that as a last resort the Interior Board of Indian Appeals can look this case over?
Thanks George.
It may come as somewhat of a surprise that the notices that were sent to them from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) were not picked up; well if you live off the rez it may come as a surprise. I personally have had several mail items returned to the sender because I didn't pick up the mail in time. It's a fact of life for some people and post office boxes.
But that is a minor point in this scenario. So don't take the red herring! Stick to the point!
The point is that there was a sovereign governmental process for processing bids. The TRIBAL members (PEOPLE LIKE YOU) who already had a lease in years past on the Crow Reservation had the chance to match the bid put out by the new (shadow) tribal member bids.
What is a shadow member? Much like many small TIMBER-BUSINESSES, it's a false front that a tribal member is an owner of a small business. If they are a timber company, then it means that they get preference in timber bids. If it's a Cattle company, they get preference in Grazing bids.
How does it work?
"Well Zeke, ya see that Tribal Member over there chewing on bubble gum doing, nothing in particular?"
"Do I see him, heck I can hear him popping bubbles!"
"Well Zeke, ya go make him an offer to make money for nothing"
"OK I get it. I make him a majority interest holder in 'our lil ol cattle company' and promise to give him 1 dollar an acre ($4,000 dollars) for getting me a preferential-like bid on them there 4,000 acres right?"
"There's a smart boy Zeke..."
Aha! Timber, Grazing, Tree planting, any number of businesses can make the world seem much different if they have a tribla member partner with a majority interest in their enterprise. Which is ok, as long as it's above board. If anybody else is a fan of 8-A Status stand up and burp loudly! That isn't the part that's wrong.
The part that's wrong is when BIA steps all over sovereignty. The part that's wrong is if this couple George and Nelvette Siemion don't get to pursue the appeal process to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals if they need to.
When you appeal to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, there are a multitude of areas where your appeal can be thrown out for seemingly small details. The death is in the details. Read your CFR very well if you're gonna sit down for a bout with the BIA. If you put the wrong words on the envelope or no words, THROWN OUT! If you fail to certify that you sent the appeal to all "parties of interest" THROWN OUT! If you fail to send to everybody in the world and their cousin, THROWN OUT!
Let's hope George Skibine will allow this appeal to follow it's natural route and if need be all the way to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals. Let's hope that this appeal gets taken care of before it reaches the Interior Board of Indian Appeals. If this appeal gets to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals then it means that somebody lower than them in the Bureau, the Region, the Area, the Agency, probably isn't doing their job. The Interior Board of Indian Appeals should be the last resort of George and Nelvette Siemion. But George and Nelvette Siemion should have every right to pursue this case all the way to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals, and George Skibine seems like just the objective person to let it run its natural course. There should be none of this stepping in and pre-empting a case instead of letting the Interior Board of Indian Appeals do just what they're supposed to do.
George should, in his non-acting position, not get involved, but make sure that every step, every superintendent, director, manager, specialist, is involved and pursuing justice, whatever that decision may be. Justice is what every tribal member is looking for. Let's hope that in this case, the tribal members get their say. Let's not go for a repeat of past Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary's woeful decisions against tribal sovereignty and objective judicial inquiries. George Skibine, may we introduce you to George and Nelvette Siemion? They have a Native Land Issue to discuss with the appropriate levels of the Bureau of Indian Affairs? Could you see to it that, without influencing anybody in either direction, everybody knows that an objective, judicial decision with respect to Tribal Sovereignty is reached--and if it isn't that as a last resort the Interior Board of Indian Appeals can look this case over?
Thanks George.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
